Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Cloudevents SDK to v1.1.2 #2684

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ian-mi
Copy link
Contributor

@ian-mi ian-mi commented Mar 2, 2020

SDK version 1.1 adds distributed trace extension handling so some tests will need to be updated to expect this extension.

Touches #2559

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Mar 2, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 2, 2020
@ian-mi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ian-mi commented Mar 2, 2020

/hold need to relax some test assertions

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2020
@vaikas vaikas modified the milestone: v0.13.0 Mar 3, 2020
@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

n3wscott commented Mar 6, 2020

I will make 1.1.2 for you today

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

n3wscott commented Mar 6, 2020

@ian-mi ian-mi changed the title Update Cloudevents SDK to v1.1.1 Update Cloudevents SDK to v1.1.2 Mar 7, 2020

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2016
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove trailing whitespace:

Suggested change
Copyright (c) 2016
Copyright (c) 2016

@slinkydeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ian-mi , any idea why it doesn't work? I'm having the same problem with #2680

@ian-mi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ian-mi commented Mar 10, 2020

Yes, #2046 will need to be resolved before the SDK version can be upgraded since v1.1 adds new trace handling. I am starting on that now.

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

2 similar comments
@ian-mi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ian-mi commented Mar 17, 2020

/retest

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@n3wscott
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold
/lgtm
/approve

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 17, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2020
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ian-mi, n3wscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 745350c into knative:master Mar 17, 2020
vaikas pushed a commit to vaikas/eventing that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2020
* Update Cloudevents SDK to v1.1.2

* Ignore ce-traceparent headers in event_dispatcher_test.go
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants